Next, we have a very important class:
Array. Most of what we do as
developers is manage lists of things. Lists of photos, likes, followers,
reviews, listings, messages, rides, events, concerts, projects, etc etc etc.
The first data type we’re going to learn to help us manage lists of things is
Array. This class, unlike the ones we’ve seen until now, is really just a
container for other objects, and can hold however many objects we want.
As always, we have the formal way of creating a new object in Ruby: use the
.new method on the parent class:
cities = Array.new
Try it out and see what you get if you
As you can see, Ruby represents an
Array with square brackets,
. The brand new array is empty; let’s add some elements to it with the
.push method. Try this:
cities = Array.new cities.push("Chicago") cities.push("NYC") p cities cities.push("LA") # Add some of your own, if you like p cities
Now we’re talking! We’ve stored multiple strings within a single array using the
.push method1. Ruby separates the elements in an array with commas.
Much like with
Strings, there’s a shortcut to creating
Arrays. Rather than starting with
Array.new and building it up from scratch one
.push at a time, we can type an array “literal” directly into the code:
cities = ["Chicago", "NYC", "LA"]
This is the technique that we’ll be using most often.
Now let’s familiarize ourselves with some of
After adding elements to the list, the next most important thing we need to be able to do is retrieve an element back out from the list. Our first tool for doing that is
.at method takes an
Integer argument, which is interpreted as the position, or index, in the
Array of the element that you want to retrieve. Give it a try:
cities = ["Chicago", "NYC", "LA", "SF", "NOLA"] p cities p cities.at(2)
Whoa! Did you expect
cities.at(2) to return
"LA"? I sure didn’t, the first time I tried it; I was expecting
It turns out that pretty much every programming language indexes the elements in an array starting at zero, not at one. So the first element is retrieved with
cities.at(0), the second element with
cities.at(1), etc. You’ll get used to it after a while.
A couple of other things for you to experiment with:
What happens when you use an index greater than the length of the array?
This is our first contact with
nil, an object that represents the absence of anything. When you use an index “outside” the array, you might have expected to see an error message; but instead, Ruby returns
What happens when you use a negative index?
There’s a shorthand for
.at() which is very common, so you should be familiar with it. It’s the
. method, so we could write:
cities = ["Chicago", "NYC", "LA", "SF", "NOLA"] p cities.(2) # => "LA"
You guessed it — there’s some syntactic sugar coming up. When a class has a method named
., Ruby allows the dot to be dropped, but the method name has to then move immediately next to the object it’s being called on (no space), and the argument moves inside the method name! Altogether, this allows us to write:
cities = ["Chicago", "NYC", "LA", "SF", "NOLA"] p cities # => "LA"
Which is sort of nice. I prefer
.at because I think it reads better, but feel free to use the square brackets if you like that style better.
array = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p array
Since retrieving the elements at positions
0 (the first one) and
-1 (the last one) is so common, there are handy shortcut methods for those:
.last. Give them a try.
.index method is sort of the inverse of
.at: given an object,
.index searches within the array and returns the index where it resides. Give it a try:
cities = ["Chicago", "NYC", "LA", "SF", "NOLA"] p cities.index("SF")
Some further things for you to experiment with:
.indexreturn if the element is present in the array more than once?
.indexreturn if the element is not present in the array at all?
Before we proceed with more
Array methods, I want to go back for a minute and talk about the
.split method from the
String class. This method, when called on a
String, will return an
Array of substrings:
"alice bob carol".split # => ["alice", "bob", "carol"]
If you provide no argument, the string is split upon whitespace, which is handy for e.g. turning a sentence into a list of words:
If you do provide an argument to
.split, then the string will be chopped up wherever that argument occurs instead of whitespace — for example, use
"4,8,15,16,23,42".split(",") to split on commas.
You can also
split with the empty string,
"", as an argument in order to turn a string into an
Array of its individual characters:
a = "Hello!".split("") # => ["H", "e", "l", "l", "o", "!"] a.at(0) # => "H" a.at(-1) # => "!"
This is particularly handy for us because it allows us to get a
String of input from users with
gets and then transform it into an
Array for processing:
p "Enter a series of numbers, separated by spaces:" user_string = gets.chomp user_numbers = user_string.split length = user_numbers.count p user_string p user_numbers p "You entered " + length.to_s + " numbers."
We’ll be using this technique for the remainder of our test REPLs, to make things more interesting.
.count counts how many elements are in the list, if called with no arguments. If an argument is provided, it counts how many times that argument occurs in the list.
a = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p a.count p a.count(3)
A thin convenience layer on top of
.include? will quickly tell you whether a value is present within an
a = [ "a", "b", "c" ] a.include?("b") # => true a.include?("z") # => false
.include?, but the opposite:
a = [ "a", "b", "c" ] a.exclude?("b") # => false a.exclude?("z") # => true
array = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p array.reverse # => [3, 23, 19, 1, 3, 8]
array = [12, 4, 5, 13, 56, 32] p array.sort # => [4, 5, 12, 13, 32, 56]
array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] p array.shuffle # Returns a copy of array in random order
array = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p array.sample # => Returns a single random element from the array
a = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p a.min # => 1
a = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p a.max # => 23
a = [8, 3, 1, 19, 23, 3] p a.sum # => 57
You might come across a shorthand for
<< method, known as the “shovel” operator. This allows you to write something like:
Or with the syntactic sugar that we’re very accustomed to by now:
cities << "Chicago"
I personally prefer
.push — I think it’s more readable — but feel free to use the shovel if you like it better. ↩